Okay, for many years I’ve been trying to come up with a way to send information faster than the speed of light. I keep reading that it can’t be done, why do you ask? Because Einstein hypothesized the same thing, still, that doesn’t make sense to me considering what we know now and how quantum physics is supposed to exist. The ability of shared pairs, complementary particles to hum, buzz, vibrate or dance in unison regardless of their location, means we should be able to send information this way, vibrating one and watching the other.
Research paper suggests “spooky action at a distance” travels 10,000 times the speed of light, yet some say that doesn’t mean it can send information because mere vibrations aren’t readable, therefore meaningless. I say BS. They sure are. Vibration is on, on means one, and no vibration is off, and off means zero, so you can use binary code. All you need to do is remove electrons from the same atom and keep them isolated and have a code to use when reading their vibrations. Best of all, no one else can read or intercept the communication.
Furthermore, if one could isolate the vibrational patterns, one could use derivatives of those patterns to discern shapes against a perpendicular point and the direction of travel of both shared pairs, and by controlling the first particle, one could observe the second and observe its vibration. route that reveals the message using your code. In fact, we should be able to do this, theoretically, as long as our measurement devices are accurate and our ability to control the first shared pair is accurate.
Now I guess you could get more play out of this concept if you just weaved it into a sci-fi story, and then let human science catch up with these realities in the future, and someone might look back and say; “The author of that science fiction story predicted this.” It’s a shame that human scientists are quick to say something can’t be done, simply because they don’t know how to do it yet, or because they don’t have the tools to prove that such theories are possible.
We are not standing on the shoulders of giants, if we occasionally fail to defy their previous determinations, in fact, we are doing science a disservice when we do so; Furthermore, it was those same scientists we respected the most, those with the great breakthroughs that challenged the supposed known knowledge of their own time, so what happens to us in the current period? Are we afraid to challenge these old theories? Please consider all this and think about it.
